Was Freud Right All Along?

Might psychoanalysis, so often dismissed as speculative or outdated, still offer one of the most profound ways of understanding mental suffering? What happens when Freud meets modern neuroscience? Can the unconscious be studied through the brain?

Who still lies on the couch? Once, psychoanalysis was a widely recognized and popular form of therapy. But this pioneering therapy developed by Sigmund Freud at the end of the nineteenth century, is now often regarded with suspicion by modern science, or even considered outdated: unproven, inefficient, and expensive. More solution-focused forms of treatment, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and medication, have displaced the talking sessions of psychoanalysis.

But did we perhaps dismiss psychoanalysis too quickly? According to South African neuropsychologist Mark Solms, the answer is yes. More than any other form of therapy, psychoanalysis approaches human experience as something greater than brain activity alone, and mental well-being as more than merely the chemistry of the brain that can be altered with a pill. At the same time, evidence from neuropsychology itself suggests that psychoanalysis can have positive and lasting effects, Solms argues in his new book, The Only Cure.

Psychiatrist Damian Denys will engage in conversation with Solms: was Freud right all along?